Exactly, the Mustang used a version of the Ranger/Transit MT-82 until recently
and it stands to reason that the basic elements for a 2x4 and 4x4 manual exist.
I suspect that Ford NA wanted the lowest cost development of vehicles for its region.
the 2.3 EB builds on existing petrol 2.5 version and incorporates similar engine bay
and crash protection structures. Upgrade of frames, local versions of Dana diffs,
styling cues and interior trims, not too much there that couldn't be incorporated
into a good MCE.
One thing about an Ecoboost truck, drive in and drive out with a tune that adds
a ton of power and torque. Try doing that with an atmo V6.....
Bookmarks