2019 supercars discussion. May contain spoilers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Futura

Dane once poked fun at ford racing an old model car that was not in production. Someone shoukd remind him now of his comments and how T8 will be running a car that has no relevance to the market.

---

Did it today on FB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HSE2

So the Kelly's have been surprised by the positive fan reaction.

I'm not.

---

I also am not. They have been very savvy with how they have handled social media. I have enjoyed watching their development process.

Most if not all his supporters would be rapt they doing the switch for starters.
Would be interesting the type of new supporter they may gain in the future.
He's your typical show pony and pretty much only negative towards him I have what he did at PI way back then.
I'm just glad it tips the scales x 2 that little bit more finally.
Not impressed by the Ned livery at this stage but its countered what we've seen what the Castrol one will look like - pretty nice that suits pretty Rick.

So we have another situation where the parity was signed of and then it’s not.

Seriously there are issues with management here

Has a smell to it doesn’t it.
They are pretty much stating their intent to avoid a repeat of 2019, meaning Mustang dominance


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When the sport continues to provide critical information updates to its fans via leaks to the media you know there's a problem....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HSE2

So we have another situation where the parity was signed of and then it’s not.

Seriously there are issues with management here

---

There are a number of issues that I have and I hold very little hope of a true parity next year now. The agenda appears to be loud and clear. I am no expert but they seem to be blindly running down the same path. Have they done any wind tunnel or flow work? Just going on sector times driven by drivers whose consistency must be questioned, just from a human error point of view should be questioned. There has to be a form of objective data that could be utilised before this sort of testing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WASP

Has a smell to it doesn’t it.
They are pretty much stating their intent to avoid a repeat of 2019, meaning Mustang dominance


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

That is my worry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Perko

There are a number of issues that I have and I hold very little hope of a true parity next year now. The agenda appears to be loud and clear. I am no expert but they seem to be blindly running down the same path. Have they done any wind tunnel or flow work? Just going on sector times driven by drivers whose consistency must be questioned, just from a human error point of view should be questioned. There has to be a form of objective data that could be utilised before this sort of testing.

---

Sector times on a runway?

All parties looked at the data and agreed some extra testing was required.

Better than during the season, no?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by prydey

Sector times on a runway?

All parties looked at the data and agreed some extra testing was required.

Better than during the season, no?

---

Just days after Burgess hailed the test as a success.

My guess is Ryan S looked at the data and methodology and pulled it apart....