Track comparison Mustang GT vs Commodore SSV

[Futura]

http://www.caradvice.com.au/549248/f...on-track-test/

Sandown best lap times:

Ford Mustang GT- 1:30.88
Holden Commodore SSV- 1:32.14

Ford Mustang 1.26 seconds faster than the Holden Commodore.

Even though it was meant to be a track comparison article, the win went to the commodore. in other words, the slower time around the track by 1.26 seconds wins the comparison.

Then these article comments.

"The Commodore offers more car, more space, more practicality, and more flexibility than the Mustang, as well as some better technology, better dynamics, and arguably better performance. And all for less money"

This is a track comparison right? Comparing a two door against a 4 doir?

"This is the last locally-built Holden Commodore, and it’s based on an 11-year-old platform that debuted beneath the*billion-dollar VE Commodore back in 2006. That’s 11 years of development, of engineering work, suspension work, chassis tuning, refinement, tweaks, and so on. That’s eleven years of honing, effectively the one product, to get it to where it is today – and honestly, that level is pretty bloody good."

Never hear so much praise for a old 11 year old platform. Let me guess, its a Holden.