2019 supercars discussion. May contain spoilers.

[prydey]

My guess...

There it is

[4Vman]

There it is

How many times has Burgess got it wrong in the past 9 months?

And now you want us to believe he's suddenly got things right after claiming he was happy with the results last week??

Ive got some Nigerian shares id like to sell you....

[Donut King]

Sector times on a runway?

All parties looked at the data and agreed some extra testing was required.

Better than during the season, no?

Sector times on a runway, however fictional, are probably just as accurate with regards to parity as sector times on a live racetrack, where all sorts of factors affect the data like car setup, tyre condition and pressures, driver fatigue, fuel loads, compromises to race lines/braking/acceleration points due to traffic not to mention deliberate sandbagging, can all play their part in proving or exaggerating an advantage or defecit.

Supercars compromised on processes and data quality. Now they can't correlate data from a controlled environment to that from their compromised scenario. No Shit. We were only telling them that all year.

[prydey]

How many times has Burgess got it wrong in the past 9 months?

And now you want us to believe he's suddenly got things right after claiming he was happy with the results last week??

Ive got some Nigerian shares id like to sell you....

I don't believe he got anything wrong. It's a much better method to close a gap by a few little steps rather than one big one.

[Donut King]

I don't believe he got anything wrong. It's a much better method to close a gap by a few little steps rather than one big one.

Except when you get played and end up pushing the advantage to the other side...

[4Vman]

I don't believe he got anything wrong. It's a much better method to close a gap by a few little steps rather than one big one.

Except if you know what you're doing you get to the destination the first time.

Taking incremental steps to get there then going past that destination shows you're not really in control.

[prydey]

I don't subscribe to those theories. To each their own.

[Donut King]

I don't subscribe to those theories. To each their own.

Nah, you invent theories of your own which go against information that comes direct from those with boots on the ground in the trenches.

[prydey]

Nah, you invent theories of your own which go against information that comes direct from those with boots on the ground in the trenches.

You can believe that if it makes you feel better. Makes no difference to me.

[HSE2]

You can believe that if it makes you feel better. Makes no difference to me.

It should matter to everyone.

We live in a world that won't question what they are told, to willing to believe what are clearly agendas.

In this case, our good mate Russell Ingall has exposed pit lane as proof of what many of us have reported.

Forced to remove content from his last podcast and issue an explanation, it is that paragraph that reveals the political goings on from within this sport.

Obviously that letter has since been pull when it was pointed out he should reveal the toxic element from which his false information was gathered.

I do agree it's better to resolve questions now but that said, the fact remains that this technical committee has been able to get one change right yet.

If you are a Holden fan you should be asking why it took so many changes.
If you are a Ford fan you should be asking why it took so.manh changes.

Any fan at all should be questioning the professionalism of putting out a promotion that says everything was done, everyone was happy to be reverse inside 7 days.

The cracks have surfaced now and are getting wider. Adrian may not see the season out at this rate.

There are consequences to getting this wrong. To require teams to spend more resources and time in s something that should have been done correctly first time.